Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Embrace (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Blue Embrace (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about an American rock band that does not meet WP:BAND Rinkle gorge (talk) 20:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- In what way does it not meet those standards? Mr. Guye (talk) 02:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Which of the criteria (1-13) of WP:BAND does it meet? Tarot Records is not a major label. In fact, it's hard to find evidence that it is a "label" at all. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- In what way does it not meet those standards? Mr. Guye (talk) 02:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 13:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails to meet WP:BAND, and no evidence of "notability". A request for information how it might meet WP:BAND has been ignored. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.